Earlier today, I posted about the Jew haters amongst us. And as can be assumed by the few who follow me, I would put Barak Obama, Valerie Jarret, John Kerry to name a few at the top of my list. As such, it can be taken for granted that I feel the agreement made with Iran by this loathsome administration is an abomination not only to Israel, but in fact to the entire world. Make no mistake of this. Israel is now in stark danger and in turn so are we. Think of this. We will now allow Iran to buy ICBMs! No need for them to have them for an attack on Israel, so exactly where are those missiles meant to aim at? 20 guesses and the first 19 don't count.
Take it back one step though. As I said, they do not need ICBMs to lob a nuke into Israel.This is the same premise I put forward some time ago as to North Korea. They have nukes. But one does not have to be brain dead to realize they can lob one over the border into South Korea and easily kill roughly 35,000 Americans on duty there. This isn't histrionics, just cold facts. Well, same goes for our Jew hating Muslim friends in Iran.
Today, Gov. Huckabee in an interview with Breibart said exactly what so many are really feeling about this fiasco.
"Governor Huckabee didn’t pull any punches when
talking about Obama’s Iran nuclear deal: “This president’s foreign
policy is the most feckless in American history. It is so naive that he
would trust the Iranians. By doing so, he will take the Israelis and
march them to the door of the oven. This is the most idiotic thing, this
Iran deal. It should be rejected by both Democrats and Republicans in
Congress and by the American people. I read the whole deal. We gave away
the whole store. It’s got to be stopped.”
Of course, the liberals and Jew hating media have their panties in a bunch over his comments, but in reality can one really argue with him? After all, I mentioned in my last post how the world has once again chosen to turn it's back on the reality that is the coming of another holocaust, one that in fact has already begun if anyone with their heads out of their asses would acknowledge the slaughter of Christians as well as the attacks on Jews around the world by the Radical Muslim scum. And of course, heaven forbid if anyone equates anything or person to the Nazis, Hitler, Stalin, Mao or any of the rancid dictators who slaughtered millions so as to keep power!
Make no mistake of this. another holocaust is coming if the world chooses to ignore what is in front of their eyes!
I'll leave this for the moment with a column by Charles Krauthammer who as always concisely cuts to the meat of the situation:
"When you write a column, as did I two weeks ago, headlined “The worst
agreement in U.S. diplomatic history,” you don’t expect to revisit the issue.
We had hit bottom. Or so I thought. Then on Tuesday the final terms of the
Iranian nuclear deal were published. I was wrong.
Who would have imagined we would be giving up the conventional arms and
ballistic missile embargoes on Iran? In nuclear negotiations?
When asked at his Wednesday news conference why there is nothing in the deal
about the four American hostages being held by Iran, President Obama explained
that this is a separate issue, not part of nuclear talks.
Are conventional weapons not a separate issue? After all, conventional, by
definition, means non-nuclear. Why are we giving up the embargoes?
Because Iran, joined by Russia — our “reset” partner — sprung the demand at
the last minute, calculating that Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry were
so desperate for a deal that they would cave. They did. And have convinced
themselves that they scored a victory by delaying the lifting by five to eight
years. (Ostensibly. The language is murky. The interval could be considerably
Obama claimed in his Wednesday news conference that it really doesn’t matter
because we can always intercept Iranian arms shipments to, say, Hezbollah.
But wait. Obama has insisted throughout that we are pursuing this Iranian
diplomacy to avoid the use of force, yet now blithely discards a
previous diplomatic achievement — the arms embargo — by suggesting, no matter,
we can just shoot our way to interdiction.
Moreover, the most serious issue is not Iranian exports but Iranian imports
— of sophisticated Russian and Chinese weapons. These are untouchable. We are
not going to attack Russian and Chinese transports.
The net effect of this capitulation will be not only to endanger our Middle
East allies now under threat from Iran and its proxies, but to endanger our own
naval forces in the Persian Gulf. Imagine how Iran’s acquisition of the most
advanced anti-ship missiles would threaten our control over the Gulf and the
Strait of Hormuz, waterways we have kept open for international commerce for a
The other major shock in the final deal is what happened to our insistence
on “anytime, anywhere” inspections. Under the final agreement, Iran has the
right to deny international inspectors access to any undeclared nuclear site.
The denial is then adjudicated by a committee — on which Iran sits. It then
goes through several other bodies, on all of which Iran sits. Even if the
inspectors’ request prevails, the approval process can take 24 days.
And what do you think will be left to be found, left unscrubbed, after 24
days? The whole process is farcical.
The action now shifts to Congress. The debate is being hailed as momentous.
It is not. It’s irrelevant.
Congress won’t get to vote on the deal until September. But Obama is taking
the agreement to the U.N. Security Council for approval within days.
Approval there will cancel all previous U.N. resolutions outlawing and
sanctioning Iran’s nuclear activities.
Meaning: Whatever Congress ultimately does, it won’t matter because the
legal underpinning for the entire international sanctions regime against Iran
will have been dismantled at the Security Council. Ten years of painstakingly
constructed international sanctions will vanish overnight, irretrievably.
Even if Congress rejects the agreement, do you think the Europeans, the
Chinese or the Russians will reinstate sanctions? The result: The United States
is left isolated while the rest of the world does thriving business with Iran.
Should Congress then give up? No. Congress needs to act in order to rob this
deal of, at least, its domestic legitimacy. Rejection will make little
difference on the ground. But it will make it easier for a successor president
to legitimately reconsider an executive agreement (Obama dare not call it a
treaty — it would be instantly rejected by the Senate) that garnered such
pathetically little backing in either house of Congress.
It’s a future hope, but amid dire circumstances. By then, Iran will be flush
with cash, legitimized as a normal international actor in good standing,
recognized (as Obama once said) as “a very successful regional power.” Stopping
Iran from going nuclear at that point will be infinitely more difficult and
Which is Obama’s triumph. He has locked in his folly. He has laid down his
legacy and we will have to live with the consequences for decades. Charles Krauthammer
I have more than once ranted and raved as to the Jew hating scum that is this President, his cronies including John Kerry, Valerie Jarret and far too many on both sides of the political spectrum. Anti Semitism is in fact alive and well and unfortunately aided and abbetted by self loathing Jews (should be interesting to see exactly how Chuck Schumer reacts to this. Will he back his exulted leader or stand up for his people and in turn the world in general) as well. That is just cold hard fact.
It doesn't take an idiot to realize what true hatred is as to the Jews! Hell, just look at the U.N. Easy to figure out when we see the Muslim loving Obama sidetrack the Congress and go directly to his puppet masters at the U.N. to try and force a bad agreement on us that in reality is nothing other that complete capitulation to the cause of Radical Muslims taking another step to erase Israel and Jews form the face of the earth.
[Post by Dana]
"In spite of the concerns and objections made by lawmakers on both sides of
the aisle, President Obama stepped on and over an increasingly irrelevant
Congress and presented the Iran deal before the U.N. for a vote. Today, the
The U.N. Security Council
endorsed the landmark nuclear deal between Iran and six world powers and
adopted a series of measures leading to the end of U.N. sanctions that have
hurt the Iranian economy.
The U.S.-drafted resolution was approved in a unanimous vote also
provides a mechanism for U.N. sanctions to “snap back” in place if Iran fails
to meet its obligations.
CBS News foreign affairs
analyst Pamela Falk explained that, while Monday’s vote does make the Iran
nuclear deal international law, full implementation of the measures will be
delayed for 90 days, to allow for the U.S. Congress’ consideration as promised
by the Obama administration.
Falk explained that while Congress cannot block the implementation of the
deal, if the legislative body votes against it and has enough votes to override
a promised veto from President Obama, it could cause problems.
A U.S. official told CBS News that American law doesn’t “trump” U.N.
resolutions, but if Congress were to vote against the measure — and garner
enough votes to override a presidential veto — lawmakers could stop U.S.
sanctions being lifted, which could prompt Iran to declare the U.S. as
non-compliant with the terms of the deal and to back out.
If U.S. lawmakers were to decide after Monday’s vote that they wanted
changes to the terms of the agreement, it would essentially be too late,
because it would require the Security Council to propose a new resolution — and
there would likely be little appetite for such deliberations among the other
The critical impact of this vote cannot be overstated. Earlier this year
Andrew McCarthy warned
of what would happen after Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif
spilled the beans of the deal:
According to Zarif, the deal
under negotiation “will not be a bilateral agreement between Iran and the U.S.,
but rather one that will be concluded with the participation of five other
countries, including all permanent members of the Security Council, and will
also be endorsed by a Security Council resolution.” He hoped it would “enrich
the knowledge” of the 47 senators [whos signed the Cotton Letter] to learn that
“according to international law, Congress may not modify the terms of the
agreement.” To do so would be “a material breach of U.S. obligations,”
rendering America a global outlaw….
Clearly, Obama and the mullahs figure they can run the following stunt:
We do not need another treaty approved by Congress because the United States
has already ratified the U.N. charter and thus agreed to honor Security Council
resolutions. We do not need new statutes because the Congress, in enacting
Iran-sanctions legislation, explicitly gave the president the power to waive
those sanctions. All we need is to have the Security Council issue a resolution
that codifies Congress’s existing sanctions laws with Obama’s waiver. Other
countries involved in the negotiations — including Germany, Russia, and China,
which have increasingly lucrative trade with Iran — will then very publicly
rely on the completed deal. The U.N. and its army of transnational-progressive
bureaucrats and lawyers will deduce from this reliance a level of global
consensus that incorporates the agreement into the hocus-pocus corpus of
customary law. Maybe they’ll even get Justice Ginsburg to cite it glowingly in
a Supreme Court ruling. Voila, we have a binding agreement — without any
congressional input — that the United States is powerless to alter under
Now we see an agreement that in effect will force us to defend Iran if Israel sees the need to defend herself and attack Iran's nuclear facilities. And Asshat Kerry warned yesterday that Israel defending herself if needed would be a disastrous mistake.
" US Secretary of State John Kerry said on Friday it would be
a huge mistake if Israel decided to take unilateral military action against
Iran over its nuclear program in the future.
Kerry was asked in an NBC "Today" show interview if the nuclear deal
reached last week between would make it more likely that Israel might attempt a
military or cyber attack on Tehran.
"That'd be an enormous mistake, a huge mistake with grave consequences for
Israel and for the region, and I don't think it's necessary," Kerry said."
But, back to hatred for the Jews. We see universities, cities and county governments and more wanting to "divest" themselves of any Israeli investments they have made. We see attacks against the Jews everywhere, like Paris for example. We are seeing a huge uptick in open Jewish hatred here at home, be it defacing a synagogue, or worse. It is there and in our face!
And of course, one can be assured our leaders stand deadfast behind the U.N. as it comes to Israel especially as to bogus bullshit as below:
"A report released by the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva on Tuesday
called for alleged Israeli war criminals like Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu to be arrested and tried for having led attacks against
Orders for the report to be prepared were initially given on July 23,
2014, just 16 days into the 2014 Israel-Gaza conflict that started
when Hamas began firing rockets into Israel.
It also named as its start date June 13 — the day after Palestinian thugs kidnapped and murdered three Israeli teenagers.
Furthermore, creation of the report was directed by Mary McGowan Davis,
an American who once described Hamas — which has a solid track record of
engaging in terrorist activities and even throwing political opponents off
buildings — as being “generally tolerant of local human rights
According to Fox News, the report was extremely biased and in fact
“riddled with lies and libels.” For instance, the report ignored the fact that Hamas blatantly rejected or violated
“11 cease-fires that would have reduced Palestinian casualties by 90 percent.”
The report also denied that Hamas built and used tunnels to try and
infiltrate into Israel and kill Israeli citizens. Instead it argued that the
purpose of these tunnels could not be “conclusively determined.”
According to Fox News, the report even ostensibly forgave Hamas for
using schools to store weapons caches by arguing that “(t)he small size of
Gaza and its population density make it difficult for armed groups to always
comply with” the requirement that military operations not be carried out in
The report was in essence nothing more than an attack on Israel’s sovereignty
and right to defend itself against terrorism.
Apparently, the U.N. believed that Israelis should just mourn or make
speeches whenever terrorists kidnap and kill its citizens".
Good Grief! No wonder our allies as well as the rest of the world now hate us!
Yes, hatred for Israel and Jews is real. But let's not forget, in the Muslim world that same kind of hatred is also aimed at gays and anyone that stands up for their rights. Our schools, media and far too many officials have worked hard to indoctrinate and brainwash us into the belief that Israel and Jews are the enemy while Palestinians and Muslims or worse are our salvation. This propaganda effort, one laced with nothing but hatred and bullshit has in turn created a faction here that openly shows their hatred for Jews in general, especially Israel!
This brings us to Councilman Greenwood in NYC who, when confronted in a council meeting being disrupted by radical Muslim living scum set the record straight in an epic speech, one which I will assure you we will never hear from the likes of Obama and the rest of the Jew hating world!
Far too many people are standing back and allowing the hatred to grow, not wanting to take sides as some say or in my eyes, not wanting to openly show their hatred for Jews. Self loathing Jews refuse to stand up against it preferring to protect their phony baloney existence or worse. Whether one wants to admit it or not, far to man Jews are just letting it happen, turning a blind eye because it "doesn't affect them". In turn, civilization world wide is turning a blind eye o the reality that is hatred for the Jews! Not surprising I guess as anti-Semitism has festered in far to many countries since the beginning of time. Seems just like old times, doesn't it, like say Germany in the 30's and 40's?
unfortunately, the climate is now ripe so as to allow the open hatred of the Jews and whether one like to hear it or not, the movement is being led by not only the usual suspects, but in fat the President of the United States, his henchmen, the majority of asshats in the media and far to many elected officials! And don't get me wrong here. A good amount of the blame here in the U.S. has to go squarely on our shoulders! As I have said before, the voter did not take their jobs seriously and in turn we have allowed the world to become far more dangerous! Jew hatred is just the begiinning,. But wasn't it the same thing 75 years ago or so?
ENOUGH! Five more of our sevicemen killed by a Radical scum bag Muslim and all our so called leader can say is it is "a heartbreaking occurrence"? This rancid Jew hating, Muslim loving racist in the White House, the one who to this day calls the Ft. Hood massacre "workplace violence" wants us to believe this is not a war against us by the Radical Muslims but instead just some deranged loner?
I for one have had enough of this bullshit. Someone out there has got to call it like it is and in turn blow these bastards off the face of the earth if that's what it takes! Islamaphobia my ass! The loony left and the politically correct will call me a hater, racist or worse. SO BE IT! I do in fact detest this President , his policies and all who ignore the obvious facts so as to further their loony agenda that is destroying this country!
When a people of any kind announces they will kill you, you damned well better kill them first.Not this ass clown though. No, instead he makes agreements with the very people financing these terrorists and worse throws both our ally Israel and in turn us under the bus! And now I read he will not offer any new weaponry to Israel but since he and his minions openly display their hatred for Israel and Jews in general, I guess it is expected. I'd be shocked if I wasn't so nauseated.
Let's not forget, this is the same bastard that refuses to uphold the law and in turn Americans get killed by illegal alien trash. He attends or send representatives to funerlas of certain people so as to pound in the wedge between the races but refuses to even acknowledge someone like Katie Shaidle, the young lady murdered by an illegal alien because our President and the loonies on the left with their sanctuary cities and worse refuse to see the realities of their failed policies. Oops, what policies?
We hear Black Lives Matter but heaven forbid if a candidate of any stripe say All Lives Matter! just look at what happened yesterday. And by the way President Bozo, if black lives really matter why do you refuse to say anything as to the black on black murders in Chicago? Oops, forgot. Doesn't fit you bullshit narrative does it? But, I digress.
Back to the murders in Tennessee. A few things I stumbled across as to this piece. As I've said many times, there are people out there who can speak to thing far better than I can sometimes.
Below I found a wonderful piece by Tomi Lahren:
Per usual, it is Mark Steyn who speaks the cold, hard
Truth we need to hear and acknowledge: (my apologies, I forgot the source on this one)
A fifth victim of the Chattanooga jihad boy has died: Petty Officer Randall
Smith, US Navy.
I’m afraid the makeshift memorials of flags and other patriotic memorabilia
that have sprung up on the edge of the police tape depress the hell out of me.
A no doubt sincere veneration for the military apparently can only express
itself with a feeble passivity that is a large part of the problem. This isn’t
a time for the bumper-sticker bromides of “We salute our heroes/Thank you for
your service/We support our troops”. Among the dead are men who waged a bloody
and hard-fought battle to retake Fallujah …only to come home and die unarmed in
a crappy shopping mall at the hands of a halfwit fanatic….
A Chinese-made teddy bear from Wal-Mart is not an appropriate reaction.
Righteous anger is. And there’s not a lot of evidence of that. At that
parking-lot memorial, the public seems to discern that such anger is no longer
an approved sensibility — whereas a teary generalized sadness gets plenty of
…We who did not know them cannot mourn them: That is for their friends and
family. The nation’s duty is to avenge them — so that they did not die in vain.
I found the following fromSgt. Alonzo Lunsford:
Saying the “war is here on U.S. soil,” a victim of the 2009 Fort Hood attack
by Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan described the killing of four U.S. Marines in
Chattanooga, Tennessee, on Thursday as “an act of terror.”
He said the threat won’t go away until it is eliminated.
Sgt. Alonzo Lunsford, who survived being shot seven times by Hasan, appeared
Friday on Fox News’ “Your World,” and told host Charles Payne the White House
needed to call this attack what it truly was.
“They need to get their heads out of the fourth point of contact and call it
what it is,” Lunsford said of the Obama administration.
The “fourth point of contact” is Airborne military jargon for the derriere,
which is a somewhat more polite way of telling Obama to get his head out of his ass.
“As long as they drag their feet, people die,” Lunsford said. “Now, we
predicted this would happen years ago. It happened here in the United States
and in England as well.”
And Charlie Daniels hits a nerve as I still believe the majority of the people in this country do in fact feel as he does:
Last but not least, a letter from an ex serviceman that has been on various sites:
Promise To Five Men In Chatanooga
Thursday, July 16, five brave men
charged with the responsibility of defending this country died because they
weren't allowed to defend themselves.
They were murdered by yet another
Muslim, Muhammad Yousseff Abdulazeez, in an act of terrorism inspired by
the islamic notion of "jihad".
Every man or woman in the United
States Military, regardless of their location, find themselves today unarmed,
in what amounts to an active combat theater. The idea that they can't be
trusted with firearms is simply idiotic. The people who attack them do so
for the same reason they murder women and children. They don't have the
courage to go near anybody who has the means to defend themselves, and the
people whose policies created this situation seem to be okay with it.
People in this country, honorable
people, refer to this attack as an act of war. Islamists would like to
think of themselves as 'warriors', but they don't know what the word
means. Warriors don't go around sneaking up on unarmed people. They
give themselves far too much credit. Regardless, our president, who cares
about none of that, won't do anything about it. He refuses to acknowledge
reality, referring to the attack as a "heartbreaking
circumstance". This statement is a masterpiece of cowardice and
duplicity, even for him.
If America had a president worthy of
the title, these men would not have been attacked in the first place. We
would have responded in kind to this violence long ago, and these terrorists
would be busy murdering each other back home instead of attacking unarmed
people in our streets.
The blood of these men is on Mr.
Obama's hands. They weren't the first to die here at home, and they won't
be the last.
Mr. Obama doesn't seem to understand
any of this. Here's something else he doesn't understand: The only
reason we have a Commander-in-Chief in the first place is because he was
delegated, by the People, to take care of just this kind of threat. If he
chooses to dishonor that responsibility, he merely renders himself
irrelevant. The only thing he will dishonor in the end is himself and his
office. Millions of brain dead liberals notwithstanding, this is a nation
of free men, and if he won't defend America, the rest of us will. That is
a promise to these men, and everyone else who died defending this country.
Will we as a country defend America as he states above? Have we completely lost our will and in turn will we allow this Muslim Loving, Anti-Jew, Anti-American ideals President and his followers on both the left and rightto continue to destroy this country from within? Will we avenge our service men and women, not only the latest five to be killed but all, including those at Ft Hood who were killed by MUSLIMS?!