As I was trying to come up with how
I wanted to comment on the idiocy that is this administration and the political
correctness that prevents us from calling a spade a spade as it pertains to the
disease that is inherent in Islam, I stumbled on the below in various posts
yesterday (I put some of it in bold for emphasis).
Before I go on, I start with what
should be my closing arguments with the great Judge Jeanine:
Please note. All religions have had
their tenets bastardized into so called “good reasons” to attack those of opposing
views. That is not the argument here. The Koran and the false prophet Mohammed
condone the violence that we are now seeing. Just as the facts were there for
all to see in the writings and life of the traitor in the White House as to his
communist, leftist, pro Muslim racist stances if one had only looked, so it is
with Islam. As such, we as a people must stand up against this cancer and it is a cancer!
“Last week at the United Nations,
President Obama said, “We have reaffirmed again and again that the United
States is not and never will be at war with Islam. Islam teaches peace. Muslims
the world over aspire to live with dignity and a sense of justice. And when it
comes to America and Islam, there is no us and them. There is only us, because
millions of Muslim Americans are part of the fabric of our country,” Obama
said. “So we reject any suggestion of a clash of civilizations.”
It's interesting to note that the "religion of peace"
is at war with everyone -- including fellow Muslims who don't see the Qur-an
quite the same way that they do.”
Now, with the beheading in Ok and
the MSM and politically correct morons doing their best to white wash it as “workplace
violence” when in fact the murderer is an Islamic convert (which the media
refuses to report on) one has to assume the threats made by Islamists on the
whole are in fact real! But not to our President! No siree! On to the golf
course and not one comment from them as to the OK Islamist beheading of an
innocent woman!
Moron Alert! A Muslim beheaded a
woman! No different than the FT. Hood shootings! A Muslim killed his fellow
soldiers! Workplace violence my ass! This entire nation has got to get their
collective heads out of their asses and admit to themselves the evil that is
radical Islam! I don’t give a damn if I’m hurting the feelings of the poor so
called moderate Muslims, you know, those who supposedly are against the
radicals. My ass! Many say they are scared to stand up to it. Well, does one think
our forefathers weren’t scared when they took a stand against the tyranny by
Britain? Get over it people! I for one will rot in hell before I allow the
Islamic Sharia and way of life take over this country!
Nooo! They’re just a tiny little Islamic Jihadist Terrorist Organization. Right?
This President continues to display just how ill-equipped he is for this job.
At a fundraiser last night in Newport, Rhode Island, President Obama played down the threat from the terrorist army ISIS. “We have to be vigilant,” he told the group of donors, “but this doesn’t immediately threaten the homeland.”
Obama also claimed to be “seeing a change in the order in the Middle East.” He called it “scary.”
The comments come after American journalist James Foley was beheaded by ISIS.
“[I]nternationally, we’re going through a tumultuous time. And I don’t have to tell you, anybody who has been watching TV this summer, it seems like it is just wave after wave of upheaval, most of it surrounding the Middle East. You’re seeing a change in the order in the Middle East. But the old order is having a tough time holding together and the new order has yet to be born, and in the interim, it’s scary,” Obama said.
That’s like FDR saying the Nazis and Imperial Japan were just going through a change in order, and “‘Gosh, golly and gee whiz, that’s scary!”
The Iman below was just arrested in Britain and has had more than one set to with Sean Hannity. None the less he states Islam for what it is. Violent and non swerving in its beliefs.
“This comes in response to a question
posed to him concerning the act of ISIS beheading journalists: can
Islamists “hold an individual responsible, for the actions of a collective?”
“Well, as you know, as a lecturer in
Sharia law, I would say to the people in Russia, the Muslims and the
non-Muslims, that every action for a Muslim must be based upon the Qur’an, the
word of Allah, and the teachings of the messenger Mohammed… who is the final
messenger for mankind,” Choudary said.
“I mean I would first invite the
people to think about and embrace Islam but those who are already Muslim must
know that Allah mentions in the Qur’an in fact if you look in chapter 8 verse
60, he said prepare as much as you can steeds of war to terrorize the enemy. So
terrorizing the enemy is in fact part of Islam. I mean this is something that
we must embrace and understand as far as jurisprudence of Islam is concerned.”
He went on further to say that
Muslims don’t differentiate between “civilians and military” because civilians
are those who put the people in charge to make the decisions. He continues by
calling journalists the propaganda machines of the Obama administration.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/islamic-anjem-choudary-terrorizing-part-islam/#qmk0iMxOmPaHKTAo.99
And while I’m on the subject of
morons, let’s get back to the so called leader of the free world.
The president’s remarks came just hours after U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron warned that his county is facing the “greatest terrorist threat” in history and as U.S. officials say there has been a “significant increase” in jihadi chatter leading up to the 13th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.
Obama, however, said that the “truth of the matter” is that the “world has always been messy.”
“[W]e’re just noticing now because of social media … intimate detail the hardships that people are going through.”
I next want to cite a fine article
from Political Pistachio:
Via Political
Pistachio:
A
Former Muslim Tells The Truth About Islam
by JASmius
Brother Rachid addresses Barack Obama about ISIS
and Islam; he explains to him how ISIS is imitating the prophet Muhammad in
every detail they do. The Islamic State represents Islam.
A few verses from
the Unholy Qur'an:
Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing...
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until "religion is for Allah" - i.e. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.
Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."
Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.
Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing...
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until "religion is for Allah" - i.e. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.
Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."
Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.
Quran
(3:56) - "As to
those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world
and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."
Barack Obama's presponse?:
"I will
stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly
direction." - The Audacity Of Hope,
page 261
And finally, a quote from the HOLY Bible:
15 “Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in
sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. 16 You
will [a]know them by
their fruits. [b]Grapes are
not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? 17 So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad
tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree
cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut
down and thrown into the fire. 20 So
then, you will [c]know them by
their fruits.
When it comes to "standing with the Muslims," Barack Obama's deeds match the words about which he doesn't want anybody to find out. Which illustrates once again that not all of O's promises come with an expiration date; just the ones that don't further his "fundamentally transformative" agenda.
I close with something that is a
cold hard fact!
What do terrorist attacks over the last 40 years have in common? – Image: @2ANOWTHE SHOE BOMBER WAS MUSLIM
THE BELTWAY SNIPERS WERE MUSLIMS
THE FORT HOOD SHOOTER WAS A MUSLIM
THE UNDERWEAR BOMBER WAS A MUSLIM
THE U.S.S. COLE BOMBERS WERE MUSLIM
THE MADRID TRAIN BOMBERS WERE MUSLIM
THE BALI NIGHTCLUB BOMBERS WERE MUSLIM
THE LONDON SUBWAY BOMBERS WERE MUSLIM
THE MOSCOW THEATER ATTACKERS WERE MUSLIM
THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBERS WERE MUSLIM
THE PAN-AM FLIGHT 93 BOMBERS WERE MUSLIM
THE AIR FRANCE ENTEBBE HIJACKERS WERE MUSLIMS
THE IRANIAN EMBASSY TAKEOVER WAS BY MUSLIMS
THE BEIRUT U.S. EMBASSY BOMBERS WERE MUSLIMS
THE LIBYAN EMBASSY (BENGHAZI) TAKEOVER WAS BY MUSLIMS
THE BUENOS AIRIES SUICIDE BOMBERS WERE MUSLIM
THE ISRAELI OLYMPIC TEAM ATTQACKERS WERE MUSLIMS
THE SAUDI, KHOBER TOWERS BOMBERS WERE MUSLIMS
THE BEIRUT BARRACKS BOMBERS WERE MUSLIMS
THE BESLAN RUSSIAN SCHOOL ATTACKERS WERE MUSLIMS
THE FIRST WORILD TRADE CENTER BOMBERS WERE MUSLIMS
THE BOMBAY & MUMBAI INDIA ATTACKERS WERE MUSLIMS
THE ACHILLE LAURO CRUISE SHIP HIJACKERS WERE MUSLIMS
THE SEPT 11TH 2001 AIRLINE HIJACKERS WERE MUSLIMS
No comments:
Post a Comment